Natural Law :: essays research papers

subjective Law     The School of Natural Law Philosophy was an intellectual group ofphilosophers. They developed raw(a) ship canal of thinking about religion and government.Natural law was based on moral principles, but the overall outlook changed withthe eons.     John Locke was a slap-up philosopher from the middle of the 17th century.He was a primary contributor to the new ideas concerning inbred law of thattime. He argued that humans in the state of constitution are free and equal, yetinsecure in their freedom. When they enter society, they abdicate only suchrights as are necessary for their security and for the ballpark good. He alsobelieved that each individual retains fundamental prerogatives drawn fromnatural law relating to the integrity of the person and property. This naturalrights theory was the basis of non only the American, but also the Frenchrevolution. 1 During his lifetime, he wrote numerous essays and letters to his colleagues on a variety of topics2 earn on Toleration (1689) Second Letter on Toleration (1690) Two Treatises of political sympathies (1690) Essay Concerning adult male Understanding (1690) virtually Considerations of the Consequences of Lowering of Interest,and Raising the honour of Money (1691) Third Letter on Toleration (1692) Some Thoughts Concerning precept (1693) Further Considerations Concerning Raising the Value of Money (1693) The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695) A defense reaction of the Reasonableness of Christianity (1695) A Second Vindication of the Reasonableness of Christianity (1695) A Letter to the Bishop of Worcester (1697) Discourse on Miracles Fourth Letter for Toleration An Examination of buzz off Malebranches Opinion of Seeing All Thingsin God Remarks on Some of Mr Norriss Books Conduct of the Understanding     Lockes greatest philosophical contribution is his Essay ConcerningHuman Understanding. In the winter of 1670, five or si x friends were talking inhis room, probably in London. The topic was the "principles of morality andrevealed religion," but arguments arose and no solid progress or seriousdiscussion took place. Then, he goes on to say, "it came into my thoughts thatwe took a wrong course, and that before we set ourselves upon inquiries of thatnature, it was necessary to examine our own abilities, and take on what objects ourunderstandings were, or were not, fitted to deal with." At the request of hisfriends, Locke agreed to write consume his thoughts on this question at their nextmeeting, and he expected that a single sheet of paper would suffice for thepurpose. Little did he project the importance of the issue which he raised, andthat it would take up his free time for nearly twenty years.