Literature Review How to write

publications r evaluation How to write BY Ravit*G1 Article 1 Writing a publications Review What is a Literature Review? A publications limited recap is a survey and discussion of the belles-lettres in a given bea of study. It is a concise all overview of what has been studied, argued, and established about a egress, and it is usually rised chronologically or thematically. A localise asides follow is pen in essay format. It is non an annotated bibliography, because it groups related works unitedly and discusses trends and developments rather than focvictimization on one item at a time.It is not a summary rather, it evaluates previous and urrent look for in guess to how relevant and/or useful it is and how it relates to your own interrogation. A Literature Review is more than an Annotated Bibliography or a summary, because you are organizing and presenting your sources in terms of their overall relationship to your own project. Purpose A literature review is wr itten to high dispirit limited arguments and ideas in a field of study. By highlighting these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the field, and also where the weaknesses, gaps, or areas needing tho study are.The review should therefore also ground to the reader why the riters explore is useful, necessary, primal, and valid. Questions a Literature Review Should Answer Asking caputs much(prenominal) as the following will help you sift through your sources and organize your literature review. Remember, the literature review organizes the previous research in the light of what you are planning to do in your own project. Whats been done in this topic area to date? What are the signifi merchantmant discoveries, key concepts, arguments, and/or theories that scholars hurl put forward? Which are the important works?On which particular areas of the topic has previous research oncentrated? Have there been developments over time? What methodologies have be en used? Are there any gaps in the research? Are there areas that havent been looked at closely yet, but which should be? Are there reinvigorated flairs of looking at the topic? Are there improved methodologies for researching this subject? What future directions should research in this subject take? How will your research build on or depart from current and previous research on the topic? What share will your research make to the field?Length The length ofa literature review varies depending on its purpose and audience. In a hesis or dissertation, the review is usually a full chapter (at least 20 pages), but for an denomination it whitethorn only be a few pages. Structure on that point are several ways to organize and structure a literature review. Two common ways are chronologically and thematically. Chronological In a chronological review, you will group and discuss your sources in come out of their appearance (usually publication), highlighting the changes in research in t he field and your specific topic over time.This method is useful for papers focusing on research methodology, historiographical papers, and other theme where time becomes an important lement. For example, a literature review on theories of mental illness might present how the arrest of mental illness has changed through the centuries, by giving a series of examples of key developments and ending with current theories and the direction your research will take. thematic In a thematic review, you will group and discuss your sources in terms of the themes or topics they cover.This method is often a stronger one organizationally, and it can help you resist the urge to summarize your sources. By grouping themes or topics of research together, you will e able to demonstrate the types of topics that are important to your research. For example, if the topic of the literature review is changes in best-selling(predicate) music, then there might be separate sections on research involving th e production of music, research on the dissemination of music, research on the interpretation of music, and historical studies of popular music.No matter which method you choose, remember Within each section of a literature review, it is important to discuss how the research relates to other studies (how is it similar or different, what other studies have been done, etc. as well as to demonstrate how it relates to your own work. This is what the review is for dont leave this connection out Source http//www. smu. ca/ administration/library/litrev. html Article 2 Write a Literature Review 1.Introduction Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources (e. g. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and lively evaluation of each work. The purpose is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic. 2. Components Similar to primitive research, development of the literature review requires tetrad stages Problem formulationwhich topic or field is cosmos examined and what are its component issues?Literature searchfinding bodilys relevant to the subject being explored Data evaluationdetermining which literature makes a significant character to the arrangement of the topic Analysis and interpretation discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature Literature reviews should comprise the following elements An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, on with the bjectives of the literature review Division of works under review into categories (e. g. hosepipe in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses entirely) write up of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most win over of their opinions, and make the great est contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to ProvenanceWhat are the authors credentials? Are the authors arguments supported by evidence (e. . primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)? objectivenessls the authors perspective even- handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the authors point? enduringnessWhich of the authors theses are most/least convincing? ValueAre the authors arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? 3. Definition and Use/PurposeA literature review whitethorn constitute an essential chapter of a thesis or dissertation, or may be a self-contained review of writings on a subject. In either case, its purpose is to Place each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review thread the relationship of each work to the others under consideration Identify advanced ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in, previous research Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies Identify areas of prior learning to prevent duplication of effort Point the way forward for come along researchPlace ones original work (in the case ot theses or dissertations) in the context ot existing literature The literature review itself, however, does not present new primary scholarship. http//library. ucsc. edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review What is a review of the literature? A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by sure scholars and researchers. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliographysee the bottom of the future(a) page), but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay, researc h eport, or thesis.In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a maneuver concept (e. g. , your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not Just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and demonstrate skills in 2 areas 1 . formation seeking the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles and books 2. critical appraisal the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased and valid studies. A literature review must do these things 1 . be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are developin g 2. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known 3. identify areas of controversy in the literature 4. ormulate questions that need barely research Ask yourself questions like these . What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps to define? 2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory? methodology? policy? quantitative research (e. g. on the effectiveness of a new procedure)? qualitative research (e. g. , studies )? 3. What is the scope of my literature revie w? What types ot publications am I using (e. g. , Journals, books government documents, popular media)?What discipline am I workings in (e. g. , nursing psychology, sociology, medicine)? 4. How good was my information seeking? Has my search been replete(p) enough to ensure Ive found all the relevant material? Has it been compress enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is the number of sources Ive used grab for the length o f my paper? 5. Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I follow through a set of concepts and questions, comparing items to each other in the ways they deal with them?